Why us
Why people choose Kermani LLP
Personal Attention & Results: We’re highly-rated by our clients and have recovered over $100,000,000 in combined verdicts and settlements.
Recovered for Clients
Litigated Trials
Successful Cases
Attorneys & Staff
VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS
We deliver results for our clients
We believe that everyone deserves to be treated fairly, and we're here to fight for our clients' rights.
How it works
About our process
Our approach is thorough and empathetic. We strive to fully understand your situation and all potential damages.
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
table of contents
You know the other driver was on their phone. Maybe you saw it a second before impact. Maybe a witness told you afterward. But when you open the police report, it says “failure to maintain lane”—nothing about a phone.
The at-fault driver's insurer seizes on that gap. No mention of a phone means nothing to prove. They push a lowball offer and bet you'll take it. Meanwhile, medical bills keep climbing, your employer is running out of patience, and every unanswered day feels heavier than the last. It's the most common scenario Atlanta distracted driving accident lawyers see—and the one insurers count on.
As an experienced texting & driving accident lawyer, Kermani LLP handles these cases differently. We don't wait for the insurance company to “figure it out.” We launch our own investigation—from subpoenaing carrier records to forensic analysis of the device itself—and reconstruct exactly what the driver was doing at the moment of impact. Over the past five years, the firm has tried more than 100 cases and recovered over $100 million for clients. That's not marketing language. It's the Kermani Method: relentless investigation and proven results.
The Scale of the Problem: Distracted Driving in Georgia
Distracted driving has moved well beyond everyday carelessness. According to the Governor's Office of Highway Safety (GOHS), 55% of all crashes in Georgia in 2023 involved at least one confirmed or suspected distracted driver. More than half. Not the exception—the norm.
The problem of distracted driving Georgia is especially acute in Atlanta. A 2024 observational study by Emory University, conducted at 400 sites statewide, found that 16.2% of drivers in the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area showed visible signs of distraction: texting, talking on the phone, eating behind the wheel. The statewide average was 14.7%. In practical terms, roughly one in six drivers on Atlanta roads at any given moment is doing something other than driving.
Where does this hit hardest? The Downtown Connector—a 7.4-mile stretch of I-75/I-85 cutting through the city center—averages about 9 crashes per day: 3,353 collisions in 2024 alone. I-285, known locally as the “Circle of Death,” added another 1,192 over the same period, where abrupt lane changes and poor road design make any distraction especially deadly. Moreland Avenue, Peachtree Road, and Martin Luther King Jr. Drive—each logs more than 400 crashes a year. On the interstates, the problem compounds when distracted truck drivers are involved. A distracted 18-wheeler operator leaves no margin for error.
GOHS data underscores an uncomfortable truth: the real numbers are almost certainly higher. Distracted driving is difficult to document in a police report, and in many cases it goes unrecorded entirely.
Georgia's Hands-Free Act: What the Law Prohibits (O.C.G.A. § 40-6-241)
Since July 1, 2018, Georgia has enforced the Hands-Free Act—one of the strictest laws in the country governing electronic device use behind the wheel.
What Is Prohibited
The statute bars drivers from physically holding or supporting with any part of the body a wireless telecommunications device or stand-alone electronic device while the vehicle is in motion. Specifically:
- Holding a phone in your hand, cradling it between shoulder and ear, resting it on your knee
- Writing, sending, or reading text messages, emails, or chat messages
- Watching video (navigation excepted)
- Recording or streaming video (except continuous systems like dashcams)
What's allowed: earpieces or headsets for voice calls, GPS navigation, and voice-to-text commands.
When the Law Does Not Apply
The restrictions lift in four situations: emergency calls reporting a crash, fire, or crime; utility workers responding to emergencies; police officers, firefighters, or paramedics on duty; and when the vehicle is lawfully parked (O.C.G.A. § 40-6-241(g)).
How a Phone Ticket Strengthens Your Injury Claim
A Hands-Free Act violation isn't just a $50–$150 fine. In a civil case, it triggers the doctrine of negligence per se: when a driver breaks a law designed to protect people from a specific harm, and that harm occurs, fault is established as a matter of law. You don't need to separately prove the driver was “unreasonable.” The violation speaks for itself.
That simplifies the case dramatically. A skilled cell phone accident lawyer in Atlanta leverages the citation as a weapon: it becomes far harder for an insurer to contest liability when the file includes a documented Hands-Free Act violation.
How We Prove the Other Driver Was Texting
This is the central question in every distracted driving case—and where most victims feel stuck. The police report may say nothing about a phone. The at-fault driver denies everything. The insurer pretends that without a direct admission, nothing can be proven. Distracted driving accident attorneys at Kermani LLP know better.
Subpoenaing Cell Phone Records
Once a lawsuit is filed, we gain the right to subpoena the at-fault driver's carrier records. Those records reveal the timing and duration of calls, when texts were sent and received, and data transmission volumes—down to the minute. If a call was active or a message went out at the moment of impact, that's direct evidence. But here's the catch: these records can't be obtained without a filed lawsuit. That's precisely why early involvement of an attorney matters.
The Spoliation Letter: Protecting Evidence from Destruction
Before we even file suit, our team sends a spoliation letter—a formal preservation demand—to the at-fault driver, their insurer, and the carrier. The letter creates a legal obligation to preserve all data connected to the incident: call logs, text messages, app data, vehicle computer readings.
If the at-fault driver deletes messages or wipes their phone after receiving that letter, it constitutes spoliation of evidence. Georgia courts impose serious sanctions. These range from instructing the jury to presume the destroyed data was unfavorable to the party who destroyed it, all the way to granting full liability on the negligence question.
Forensic Phone Analysis
Carrier records show calls and texts but reveal nothing about app activity—Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat. When we suspect the driver was scrolling an app rather than texting, we bring in a digital forensics expert. The specialist extracts data directly from the device and determines whether the screen was unlocked at the moment of impact, which app was active, and whether the driver was interacting with the screen.
The vehicle's Event Data Recorder (EDR), its “black box,” fills in the rest: speed, braking, and acceleration for the seconds before impact. If the driver never touched the brakes before the collision, that's indirect but powerful evidence their attention was somewhere else.
Social Media Activity
We check timestamps on the at-fault driver's posts, stories, and sent messages. An Instagram post published one minute before the crash is evidence that's hard to explain away. Some platforms store precise metadata—time, geolocation, connection type—all of it recoverable. Atlanta distracted driving accident lawyers know where to look and how to preserve this data before it disappears.
Types of Distraction Beyond Texting
The Hands-Free Act targets device use, but distracted driving doesn't stop there. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration identifies three categories of distraction, each of which can ground a civil claim.
Visual Distraction
The driver takes their eyes off the road: adjusting the GPS, changing the radio station, rubbernecking at a crash on the shoulder. Two seconds without visual contact at 65 mph covers nearly 200 feet of blind travel. On Atlanta's city streets, that's enough to miss a pedestrian in a crosswalk. Cases involving pedestrians hit by texting drivers account for 19% of serious injuries in distracted driving crashes.
Manual Distraction
Hands leave the wheel: eating, drinking coffee, reaching for something on the back seat, fixing hair. Subsection (b) of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-241 establishes a general duty to exercise due care while driving, and any manual distraction can qualify as a breach of that standard.
Cognitive Distraction
The most insidious type, and the least obvious. The inattentive driving definition covers any activity that diverts a driver's mental attention from safe vehicle operation—even with hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. Talking on a hands-free device. Arguing with a passenger. Running through work problems in your head. Reaction time under cognitive distraction drops just as sharply as with physical distraction. GOHS classifies it as a full category of distracted driving alongside visual, manual, and auditory.
Punitive Damages in Georgia
Most claims cover concrete losses: medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering. But when the at-fault driver's conduct crosses from ordinary negligence into something worse, Georgia law allows a claim for punitive damages—money imposed not to compensate, but to punish.
Under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-5.1(b), punitive damages require “clear and convincing evidence” that the defendant's actions showed willful misconduct, malice, or “conscious indifference to consequences.”
What does that look like? A driver watching Netflix behind the wheel. Someone who racked up two Hands-Free Act citations in the past year and kept texting. A driver livestreaming on social media at the moment of impact. Facts like these can open the door.
The general cap is $250,000 (O.C.G.A. § 51-12-5.1(g)). But when the driver was also under the influence of alcohol or drugs—a DUI combined with texting, for instance—the cap is removed entirely (O.C.G.A. § 51-12-5.1(f)). Punitive damages aren't guaranteed in every case, but experienced texting and driving accident attorneys use the threat alone as a powerful lever in settlement negotiations.
Common Injuries in Distracted Driving Crashes
GOHS data shows that rear-end collisions are the most common crash type involving a distracted driver: 64% on interstates, 72% on major arterial roads. A driver who isn't watching the road doesn't brake. The impact arrives at full speed.
The injuries track the physics:
- Whiplash and cervical spine damage from the violent snap of the head in a rear-end strike. What starts as neck pain can develop into a chronic condition requiring months of physical therapy
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in head-on collisions where a distracted driver drifts into oncoming traffic. Shepherd Center in Atlanta is one of the country's leading TBI rehabilitation facilities
- Spinal cord injuries in high-speed interstate collisions. Grady Memorial Hospital, Georgia's largest trauma center, treats a disproportionate share of these patients from the Downtown Connector and I-285
- Fractures and orthopedic injuries, particularly in T-bone collisions at intersections where a distracted driver runs a red light
When a crash results in spinal cord damage or traumatic brain injury, long-term consequences and treatment costs escalate dramatically. Atlanta car accident attorneys at Kermani LLP fight to ensure compensation fully reflects that reality.
What to Do Immediately After Being Hit by a Distracted Driver
The first minutes after a crash determine what evidence your Atlanta distracted driving accident lawyers will have months down the road. Kermani LLP recommends the SAD™ system—Safety, Ambulance, Document:
Safety. Make sure you're out of danger. If you can move, get out of the traffic flow.
Ambulance. Call 911 even if your injuries seem minor. Adrenaline masks pain, and many serious conditions don't produce symptoms for hours or days.
Document. This step is critical in distracted driving cases:
- Look for the phone. Where is it—in the driver's hand, on the seat, on the floor? Photograph it
- Tell the responding officer you suspect phone use. Ask them to note it in the report. Even if the officer can't inspect the phone on scene, your statement becomes part of the record
- Check for cameras. Surveillance cameras on nearby buildings, gas stations, traffic lights? Write down addresses—footage can be deleted within days
- Photograph everything: damage to both vehicles, road conditions, license plates, vehicle positions before they're cleared from the scene
Free Case Review
Every distracted driving case starts with one question: can we prove the driver was distracted? If you're searching for a distracted driving accident lawyer near me, answering that question is what Kermani LLP does. We work on a contingency fee basis — you pay nothing unless we deliver a result.
Contact us for a free case evaluation. Consultations are available 24/7, and our team speaks multiple languages.
Discover your legal options. Get a free case review, and pay nothing unless we win.
Testimonials
What Our Clients Say About Us
We are committed to providing our clients with the best possible service, and their feedback is what drives us to be better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Our personal injury team is here to help. Get a free case evaluation.
Can I get the other driver's phone records on my own
Generally, no. Cell carriers don't release records to private individuals. Obtaining that data requires a subpoena, which requires a filed lawsuit. That's exactly why early legal representation matters: the sooner a lawsuit is filed, the sooner we can issue a subpoena and secure the data before the carrier purges it under standard retention policies. Kermani LLP begins preparing subpoena requests during the initial consultation.
Does eating while driving count as distracted driving
Yes. The Hands-Free Act (O.C.G.A. § 40-6-241(c)) targets electronic devices specifically, but subsection (b) of the same statute imposes a general duty on drivers to “exercise due care” and avoid actions that distract from safe vehicle operation. If a driver was eating a burger, spilled coffee, or reached for a dropped item—and that led to a crash—their conduct qualifies as negligence. Insurers frequently try to downplay these cases, but Georgia courts have consistently recognized manual and visual distraction as grounds for civil liability.
How does a Hands-Free Act ticket affect my injury claim
A citation for violating the Hands-Free Act lays the groundwork for negligence per se. A violation of a law designed to prevent exactly this kind of harm is, by itself, proof of fault. Your attorney doesn't need to convince the jury the driver “acted unreasonably”—showing the violation and its connection to the crash is enough. In practice, a citation dramatically strengthens your negotiating position. Insurers know that contesting liability under these circumstances is an uphill fight.
What if the at-fault driver deleted their texts after the crash
That's spoliation of evidence, and Georgia courts don't take it lightly. The court can instruct the jury to assume the deleted data contained information unfavorable to the person who destroyed it. In the most egregious cases, the court may enter a finding of liability outright. This is exactly why Kermani LLP sends a spoliation letter within the first days after a client contacts us—before we even file suit. The letter creates a legal duty to preserve all data and turns any subsequent deletion into evidence of bad faith.
How long do I have to file a lawsuit
Georgia's statute of limitations for personal injury claims is two years from the date of the crash (O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33). In cases involving fatal distracted driving crashes, the same two-year window runs from the date of death. For minors, the clock is tolled until they turn 18 (O.C.G.A. § 9-3-90). Still, texting and driving accident lawyers strongly advise against waiting. Digital evidence—carrier records, app data, surveillance footage—gets purged under standard retention policies long before that two-year deadline arrives.
Can I still file a claim if I was partially at fault
Georgia uses a modified comparative negligence system with a 50% bar (O.C.G.A. § 51-11-7). If your share of fault falls below 50%, you keep the right to compensation—reduced proportionally by your percentage of blame. Assigned 20% fault? You recover 80% of the total award. But at 50% or above, you recover nothing. Insurance companies routinely inflate the victim's fault percentage. It's one of their go-to tactics for driving down payouts, and an attorney's job is to push back and make sure the facts speak for themselves.
Practice areas
Explore More
Explore other practice areas our firm specializes in
Receive a FREE case assessment
Every case is unique, so we tailor our approach to meet your specific needs.

